edsu
- probably shouldn't go to bed w/ this oclc api script running, gettin' all the opac urls in the US of A for about 1 hour ago from Seesmic
- @ is a good general indicator of how badly managed author identity is in the scholarly repository communityabout 1 hour ago from Seesmic in reply to dewitt
- @ hey nice, you went w/ the canonical job?about 4 hours ago from Seesmic in reply to kapilvt
- @ printing for the train ride home, thnx!2:06 PM Nov 6th from Seesmic in reply to azaroth42
- @ heheh, sure no problem -- i was quite chuffed to see it :-) just wish I could've heard the presentation ...1:34 PM Nov 6th from Seesmic in reply to adrianstevenson
- @ yeah, i think i knew that a year or so ago, but just re-learned it in a different context :-)8:14 AM Nov 6th from Seesmic in reply to dewitt
- @ nice slides about and rdf's place in it disclaimer: there's a photo of my ugly mug in there8:07 AM Nov 6th from Seesmic
- @ nice! i'm just now realizing that googlebook search api is atom and opensearch already; curl | xmllint --format -7:55 AM Nov 6th from Seesmic in reply to dewitt
- @ is there any chance of at books.google.com? and maybe even some opds atom coming back?6:57 AM Nov 6th from Seesmic
- RT @: Considering 13 Jan 2010 for first Dutch meetup in Amsterdam. Speak up if yer interested or the date conflicts.6:38 AM Nov 6th from Seesmic
- good q/a with @ at the meetup ; kinda wish he said was REST to the 2nd question 6:22 AM Nov 6th from Seesmic
- @ yeah, and other people have trodden the road already ...3:45 AM Nov 6th from web in reply to sgillies
- watching streaming apachecon lightning talks 6:17 PM Nov 5th from Seesmic
- OH: I've created a monster ... and I love it!4:07 PM Nov 5th from txt
- @ wow ... I thought you were required by law to have your openid tattooed to your right forearm in the SF Bay area...2:35 PM Nov 5th from Seesmic in reply to dret
- @ also, have you written about your work on the swedish legal informtion system w/r/t atom and rdf?12:08 PM Nov 5th from Seesmic in reply to niklasl
- @ thanks for writing, i wonder could we just talk about it on semweb discussion list, would that be too inflamatory?12:07 PM Nov 5th from Seesmic in reply to niklasl
- @ you don't have an openid?!11:57 AM Nov 5th from Seesmic in reply to dret
- @ @ @ thanks guys -- what did you think of jcowan's idea of defining an atom serialization for rdf?7:29 AM Nov 5th from Seesmic in reply to sgillies
- @ i took a stab at it over at I regret the tone and content of the previous post, I feel like I'm grasping at straws7:42 PM Nov 4th from Seesmic
|
|