dsaff
-
@ You mean it all starts innocuously, and before you know it, you've proved the incompleteness theorem yet again?
4:28 PM May 26th
via TweetDeck
in reply to marick
-
(@) RT @ @: What oil-sands mining in Alberta actually looks like.
1:43 AM May 22nd
via TweetDeck
-
RT @ System Rules 1.2.0 has improved support for testing code which reads from System.in.
1:37 AM May 22nd
via TweetDeck
-
@ this swap was in the kids' room? More details, please! :-)
3:37 AM May 12th
via TweetDeck
in reply to PaulRubel
-
@ Here's to a future in which the War on Terror feels as quaint as the anarchist scare.
2:58 AM May 11th
via TweetDeck
in reply to kcsaff
-
RT @ Haskell's Wager: what if infinite lists can suffer infinitely even when lazily evaluated?
8:55 PM May 9th
via TweetDeck
-
RT @ Perspective: All of Earth's Water in a Single Sphere
8:36 PM May 9th
via TweetDeck
-
RT @ Systems take on biological characteristics when growth favors the current structure over restructuring.
4:46 AM Apr 23rd
via TweetDeck
-
@ We never thought to just ask its name, and now it's too late...
5:05 AM Feb 10th
via TweetDeck
in reply to kcsaff
-
RT @ "Life is, for most of us, a continuous process of getting used to things we hadn't expected. " -- Anonymous
3:39 AM Jan 31st
via TweetDeck
-
(That last @ retweet was actually from my own anonymous feedback form. Happy to de-anonymize. It was great.)
7:25 PM Jan 28th
via web
-
Quote: "It was great to see 9 kids have their 1st experience telling technology what to do, rather than listening to it"
8:46 AM Jan 27th
via HootSuite
-
RT @ Do television writers have bumper stickers that read "I support our Tropes"? Is that even funny? Well do they drive SUVs or not?
11:37 AM Jan 28th
via TweetDeck
-
@ sadly, not as often as sisyphean.
8:58 PM Jan 22nd
via TweetDeck
in reply to ckeithray
-
@ Thanks!
3:21 PM Jan 17th
via TweetDeck
in reply to wallingf
-
I'm joining the Android Books team:
8:34 AM Jan 17th
via TweetDeck
-
RT @ An interesting read for the many of us who struggle to lose or maintain weight:
4:57 AM Jan 2nd
via TweetDeck
-
RT @ If the programmers like each other, they play a game called "pair programming". If not, then the game is called "peer review".
5:20 PM Dec 31st, 2011
via TweetDeck
-
@ Totally missed it. Thought you earnestly meant humiliation for the giver, not sarcastically for the recipient. Tin ear, mea culpa.
10:19 AM Dec 28th, 2011
via TweetDeck
in reply to marick
-
@ Which verse is that? (Not that it's a bad idea, just citation desired...)
7:32 PM Dec 27th, 2011
via TweetDeck
in reply to marick
|
|