dot_NET_Junkie
-
Excellent article about GUIDs as PKs and their performance.
about 15 hours ago
via bitly
-
@ that seems a shift from the advise given by your book, or am I wrong?
7:49 AM Jun 3rd
via TweetDeck
in reply to ploeh
-
@ but a Local Default should be refactored to property injection (page 148). Result is again one single ctor :-)
7:05 AM Jun 3rd
via TweetDeck
in reply to ploeh
-
@ That said, I agree that it should be rare with overloaded ctors in a Service.
3:52 AM Jun 3rd
via MetroTwit
in reply to dot_NET_Junkie
-
@ As I see it,that article is about design of primitives, domain objects. What's the meaning and use of multiple ctors in a service?
5:53 PM Jun 2nd
via web
in reply to ploeh
-
@ I think you missed one of my tweets. Here you say "When it comes to ctor Injection, ambiguity is a design smell"
5:19 PM Jun 2nd
via web
in reply to ploeh
-
@ I'm sorry, you call it a "design smell" which is probably even worse than a "code smell" :-)
4:50 PM Jun 2nd
via TweetDeck
in reply to ploeh
-
@ Here you call it a code smell
4:48 PM Jun 2nd
via TweetDeck
in reply to ploeh
-
@ but you do think it is code smell. Just as with the "SL = anti-pattern", it is good to have a clear explanation on your blog IMO.
4:22 PM Jun 2nd
via TweetDeck
in reply to ploeh
-
@, would be great if you wrote a "multiple ctors = anti-pattern" article. Allows me to refer to that, stead of having to explain it :-)
3:09 PM Jun 2nd
via TweetDeck
in reply to ploeh
-
WE ENCOURAGED PEOPLE TO LEARN TO PROGRAM AND JUST LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENED
12:33 PM May 25th
via Twitter for Mac
-
. @ I'm afraid a line width of 80 and clean verbose naming in C# do not match, but good luck with that.
12:48 PM Jun 1st
via TweetDeck
-
@ it depends. Post this as a question on and tweet me the link. SO works much better for this than Twitter :-)
6:53 AM Jun 1st
via TweetDeck
in reply to philipmatix
-
@ forget that. Missed your response.
2:37 AM Jun 1st
via TweetDeck
in reply to ploeh
-
@ what is the worst container in your opinion? ?
2:36 AM Jun 1st
via TweetDeck
in reply to ploeh
-
@ you abstract the RNG behind an interface and inject a fake RNG in your tests so you can test the rest of the logic.
10:00 PM May 31st
via TweetDeck
in reply to philipmatix
-
@ ahh of course. Actions return void :-)
10:17 AM May 31st
via TweetDeck
in reply to jeremydmiller
-
@ and even than, most frameworks never need this. What do you need that for?
9:24 AM May 31st
via TweetDeck
in reply to jeremydmiller
-
Man, it's astonishing how whiny and non-functional code becomes just because you reverse a boolean test
7:32 AM May 31st
via TweetDeck
-
@ You renamed it to 'This'?
2:59 AM May 31st
via TweetDeck
in reply to ploeh
|
- Name .NET Junkie
- Location The Netherlands
- Web http://www.cuttin...
- Bio I'm a freelance developer from the Netherlands, working with .NET technology on a daily basis, and officially diagnosed as a workaholic.
|