Profile_bird

Hey there! derphilosoph is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What are you doing? Join today to start receiving derphilosoph's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

derphilosoph

  1. Wisdom comes from knowing in advance whether something expected was ever promised.
  2. "There is no reason why neurons from the instinctual parts of our brains cannot be linked to our more cognitive-cerebral ones..." (Doidge)
  3. Why do materialists wish to rid the universe of mind? If we are trying to discover what is, why so strict in denying what we all experience?
  4. Is the reason for the singular, I-voice in my head so that I can drown out all the others?
  5. human's unrestrained ability to kill? Otherwise the same criticism would apply to "normal" Darwinianism of animals in general. (p. 9 DF)
  6. Is his (Stove's) claim that under strict Darwinian direction "...there would soon be no children, no women and hence, no men..." due to
  7. Is it true that "no tribe of humans could possibly exist ... could even raise a second generation..." (Stove) following Darwinianism?
  8. Is such a 'thinking machine', whether brain or artificial construct, even possible?
  9. David Deutsch talks of a virtual reality machine that responds to an infinite set of variables.
  10. Found bookswim.com via lifehacker.com. Couldn't find many philosophy books other than those relating specifically to religion. Too bad.
  11. There is simply not enough time in a day to read all I want to read. (Or do all I want to do.)
  12. Explanations of 'because' cannot compete against the explanation of 'why.'
  13. Just because a theory is self-consistent, its explanations may prove it wrong nonetheless.
  14. Deutsch FoR:"In the absence of an independent explanation for why angels should pretend to be photons, that latter explanation is superior."
  15. Learning about optical interference and not understanding the slit experiments with photos (i.e. why interference shows as it does),
  16. We mislead ourselves by thinking that deduction always trumps observation - especially when the two disagree.
  17. For Deutsch, this seems to debunk the power of reductionist scientific thinking - i.e. reducing knowledge to purely deductive reasoning.
  18. Deutsch FoR: most of our particular knowledge about things comes from 'high-level theories'
  19. re Deutsch FoR - predictive power is something different than explanatory power.
  20. re Aquinas on MP, do we limit the concept of substance to physical, contained bodies, or can substance be something else.