chuckhollis
-
@ BTW, great job on the FAST posts today ... very impressive, as always.
about 4 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to sakacc
-
@ used to do Taq Ten martinis, was eventually seduced by the potato vodka muse.
about 4 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to sakacc
-
@ Cocktail? Great idea. Mine is a Chopin martini, very dry, lemon twist. Only one, though ...
about 4 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to sakacc
-
@ You've tweeted the same link a dozen times. We've got it, thanks. Good night.
about 4 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to valb00
-
@ @ agreed -- I need to go watch some mindless TV now ...
about 5 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to sakacc
-
@ I didn't want to take @ to task on security. Our RSA people have a rather serious view of the term.
about 5 hours ago
from TweetDeck
-
@ I don't think many customers will view a NetApp white paper as a viable alternative to a Vblock.
about 5 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to valb00
-
@ No one is claiming that one company has to own all the pieces. SIs, for example. Still, aren't you reaching just a teensy bit?
about 5 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to valb00
-
@ I think @ knows all this, he's just being stubborn ...
about 5 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to sakacc
-
@ curious as to how a storage-only vendor can claim to offer a "Dynamic Data Center". Aren't you missing a few pieces?
about 5 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to valb00
-
@ All Vblock components (and vendors) are open, as always. Vblock itself is bounded. That's a good thing.
about 5 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to valb00
-
@ You are incorrect. There are no such comments allowing customers to freely sub components. It wouldn't be a Vblock, would it?
about 5 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to valb00
-
@ Yes, words matter. And VMware's "certification"?
about 5 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to valb00
-
@ Amazon has the term "Elastic Block Storage" trademarked. I suggest you might want to make something else up.
about 5 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to valb00
-
@ I am not aware of any formal "certification" process by either VMware or Cisco as you claim -- can you elaborate?
about 5 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to valb00
-
@ Vblocks do not support storage alternatives (nor network, server or hypervisor) -- please correct
about 5 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to valb00
-
@, you are copying my blogs without respecting copyright or attribution. Please stop. immediately.
about 6 hours ago
from TweetDeck
-
@ good advice -- unless, of course, they're my own links :-)
about 9 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to storagebod
-
RT @: New details about the VMware/Cisco/EMC Vblock emerge: Chad Sakac,
about 9 hours ago
from TweetDeck
-
@ most of the material (text, slides) can be found here: -- leave comment if you'd like to discuss/debate!
about 13 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to unixplayer
|
- Name Chuck Hollis
- Location Holliston, MA
- Web http://chucksblog...
- Bio technologist, marketeer, blogger and musician
|
