Profile_bird

Hey there! Chanders is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving Chanders's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

Chanders

  1. [WTF] RT @sivavaid: Bush spokeswoman says 9/11 attack didnt happen while Bush was president & Hannity agrees: http://bit.ly/4Anmai
  2. http://bit.ly/7BYYM7 was in the Arts section, but not actually labeled a review, commentary or anything. But didn't seem to be "news" either
  3. At risk of kicking a hornet's nest did anyone else find this a very oddly written and displayed article in the NYT? http://bit.ly/7BYYM7 1/2
  4. in re: Gordon's post on computational journalism, been saving related posts via delicious tag http://bit.ly/8HPO52. Feel free to send others
  5. @jny2, would be curious to hear your reaction to @umairh here http://bit.ly/8rSmr6
  6. @jzheel I would say ... "therefore, both should be treated with minimal seriousness."
  7. @GregMitch always enjoy the Beethoven. Thanks.
  8. @Jessicist har har har
  9. RT @rachelsklar: Danah Boyd is awesome. Audience missed out. RT @mathewi: @zephoria on her failed Web 2.0 talk http://is.gd/533Ui
  10. @mathewi @palafo on + side our convo impelled me to quiz my students on how they get their news, role of search. Will blog tomorrow if I can
  11. @mathewi @palafo hey I started this twitfight. Can I still participate? Whose side am I on at this point?
  12. The idea that "Google without [news] would be farce" is laughable. Google without filesharing, porn, & soon-to-be rt indexing would be farce
  13. @mathewi @palafo... point being , people who care lot about news and spend a lot of time tweeting about it have a joru-centric view of web
  14. @mathewi @palafo I will only add that my original tweet (& only reason I mentioned NYT at all) directed at http://bit.ly/8jaEn5
  15. @davewiner I agree, but I think it would be far more interesting to see how "ordinary people" get their online news.
  16. For instance Adultfriendfinder would have stronger case in charging Google to index search results than the NYT http://bit.ly/5MPFWp. Right?
  17. @jtramsay boon as in "financial boon" or as in "this is a void that is not being filled?" The two things are different, of course. #newsink
  18. @mathewi yes, somehow this conversation got a mite garbled ;-).But the confusion may prompt a blog post ...
  19. @mathewi @palafo Yes. And such an argument makes much more sense to journalists and news lovers than it does to most average net users.
  20. Agreed, @sivavaid, but this would represent a qualitative shift if not a quantitative one, right? At least a shift back to fractured search?