arundquist
-
@ will the calc method work?
about 6 hours ago
via TweetDeck
in reply to jossives
-
@ 1) are there errors on n1, n2, and N? 2) why not MC?
about 6 hours ago
via TweetDeck
in reply to jossives
-
Quantum Mechanics When You Close Your Eyes | Cosmic Variance | Discover Magazine
about 6 hours ago
via TweetDeck
-
@ @ fyi, we'll have the inventor of desmos in Global Physics Department next week
about 16 hours ago
via TweetDeck
in reply to RobertTalbert
-
hmmm, weird. modeling gyroscope with just 2 masses -> unstable. Put 3rd mass at the axel, stable.
8:36 PM May 23rd
via TweetDeck
-
recording link for tonight's with Kevin Karplus:
8:35 PM May 23rd
via TweetDeck
-
@ maybe. The example in the intro video is very similar to some modeling I've done
5:40 PM May 23rd
via TweetDeck
in reply to occam98
-
Please join us in 2 hours for with Kevin Karplus (home schooling physics, robotics, and bioinformatics!)
4:21 PM May 23rd
via TweetDeck
-
trying to wrap my brain around Wolfram's System Modeler. Interesting
4:20 PM May 23rd
via TweetDeck
-
My phys show was a silent auction prize. Off to the winning 3rd grade class now
10:10 AM May 23rd
via Twitter for Android
-
Can a Surfboard-Sized Watercraft Cross the Pacific on Wave Power Alone? | Gadget Lab |
4:22 AM May 23rd
via TweetDeck
-
@ we interact a lot with 3M who tell us to make teams instead of groups. If one person fails all fail. Hard to do always but it works
8:57 AM May 22nd
via TweetDeck
in reply to drmagoo
-
@ @ 1 extreme would be to allow Ss to find context to apply process. Not sure that's where I am, though
12:35 PM May 21st
via TweetDeck
in reply to brybatt
-
@ I do think overlap is good, I was just struck by the very similar language of learning outcomes
12:34 PM May 21st
via TweetDeck
in reply to MrScottThomas
-
Quite the slope on this tunnel slide
11:02 AM May 21st
via Twitter for Android
-
@ or my version: N3: interacting things swap momentum, N2: different interactions have different swap rates, N1: no swap, no change
8:29 AM May 21st
via TweetDeck
in reply to jsb16
-
@ that's why I'm stuck on sci as process vs content. Can a society be informed if they only know process and not historical results?
8:28 AM May 21st
via TweetDeck
in reply to bclamore
-
if these standards prove successful (whatever that means), all of HU's non-science-major courses are redundant. Maybe that's good?
7:39 AM May 21st
via TweetDeck
-
(2/2) take the strong nuclear force. Ss should wonder what holds nuclei together (understand forces) but do they need to study it?
7:37 AM May 21st
via TweetDeck
-
I'm struggling with science as practice vs science as content. What should everyone in our society know? (1/2)
7:36 AM May 21st
via TweetDeck
|
- Name Andy Rundquist
- Location Saint Paul, MN
- Web http://arundquist...
- Bio college physics teacher, motto: higher, faster, louder. Nickname: SuperFly
|