Profile_bird

Hey there! andypowe11 is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving andypowe11's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

andypowe11

  1. @ldodds yes - clearly distinct as far as I recall - and very unhelpful to mix up imho - must admit that i've not looked at specs recently 9:32 AM Dec 4th from Seesmic in reply to ldodds
  2. @ldodds huh? surely not... (bad memories of long discussions around dc:subject) 9:16 AM Dec 4th from Seesmic in reply to ldodds
  3. @lindsayjordan wot... you mean you and @PatParslow aren't the same person? shock, horror! 9:04 AM Dec 4th from Seesmic in reply to lindsayjordan
  4. @nicoleharris now that's a lycra outfit i wouldn't particularly like to see 9:03 AM Dec 4th from Seesmic in reply to nicoleharris
  5. @Lawrie lucky sod - it's my 365 later - expect at least a "wow, amazing, congrats" 8:35 AM Dec 4th from Seesmic in reply to Lawrie
  6. @lukask in swap- http://bit.ly/5jvZtE -we modeled all 4 frbr entities (with different labels) -worked well but generally found to be complex 6:50 AM Dec 4th from Seesmic in reply to lukask
  7. @hvdsomp also agree that my characterisation of 'digital libraries vs the rest' is unhelpful 6:46 AM Dec 4th from Seesmic in reply to hvdsomp
  8. @hvdsomp yes, agreed - have seen the same, particularly concerning the uri 6:45 AM Dec 4th from Seesmic in reply to hvdsomp
  9. RT @tore: interesting #mlr frw disc going on at the CETIS-METADATA JISCMAIL list - yes is a problem the doc is reluctant to cite RDF, URI 5:24 AM Dec 4th from Seesmic
  10. @lukask interesting - but is it really a *frbr* work if the rest of frbr isn't adopted into the model - i think not? 5:22 AM Dec 4th from Seesmic in reply to lukask
  11. "let's power a house using 80 cyclists" (on uk tv last night) was quite a nice idea but let down by stupid power' analogies all the way thru 5:19 AM Dec 4th from web
  12. odd that the twitter page for an individual tweet (e.g. http://bit.ly/8wbBse) carries very few links - no next, prev, replies, retweets, ... 5:16 AM Dec 4th from Seesmic
  13. ...but pleased to have worked the phrase "i like big buts and i cannot lie" into blog comment 5:04 AM Dec 4th from Seesmic
  14. @adrianstevenson have written the talk up - "on being niche" http://bit.ly/5EJbId - to try and clarify my thinking (it may not help!)... 5:04 AM Dec 4th from Seesmic in reply to adrianstevenson
  15. @jamesclay i think the aim of openid has been to support as many ids as are necessary - but in my case it's just an accident of history 4:30 AM Dec 4th from Seesmic in reply to jamesclay
  16. @tillk yes :-) - as it turns out, i'm not the person associated with our openid foundation membership and it had expired anyway! :-) 9:19 AM Dec 3rd from Seesmic in reply to tillk
  17. i'm wanting to vote in the current openid foundation poll but i can't remember which of my openids is associated with my membership #fail 8:55 AM Dec 3rd from Seesmic
  18. @nicoleharris thanks - i appreciate your thoughtfulness 8:44 AM Dec 3rd from Seesmic in reply to nicoleharris
  19. wow... #eduPersonTargetedID is hot topic in my email inbox today - if i knew what it was i might even be interested! :-) #ukamf 8:41 AM Dec 3rd from Seesmic
  20. @adrianstevenson if you are accusing me of re-hashing old presentations then you'd be right - i call it 're-use' (which is good, right?) 6:21 AM Dec 3rd from Seesmic in reply to adrianstevenson