Profile_bird

Hey there! amosborne is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving amosborne's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

amosborne

  1. @Emmavieceli you can eat *anything* on crackers. That's what they're *for*. about 2 hours ago from web in reply to Emmavieceli
  2. @Theremina no one ever listens to me...! about 17 hours ago from web in reply to Theremina
  3. @Reynolds hahaha I thought you "shan't be tweeting tonight"? Remember? Keeping chill? (Yeah, I know.) about 17 hours ago from web in reply to Reynolds
  4. @steevo83 Hahaha about 21 hours ago from Seesmic in reply to steevo83
  5. @rstevens Oh awesome! about 21 hours ago from Seesmic in reply to rstevens
  6. THEY'RE (almost) HERE! RT @rstevens: Yay! I'm picking up (Happy()Sad) diagram shirts from Dr. T-Shirt tomorrow! http://bit.ly/2QgdL8 about 22 hours ago from Seesmic
  7. @humblefool High expectations don't necessarily make you an optimist. It could just be you've got high standards. Let's go with that. 8:41 PM Nov 24th from Seesmic in reply to humblefool
  8. @Reynolds Ta. I honestly didn't think anyone would be interested, but Warren said I should write up some of the design-y bits... 8:31 PM Nov 24th from Seesmic in reply to Reynolds
  9. The ocean is ROARING tonight. 7:20 PM Nov 24th from txt
  10. @warrenellis I think @wheresbunny beat you to that metaphor: http://is.gd/52fpD -- see? there in the top left? Doll-faced toadstools. 6:25 PM Nov 23rd from Seesmic in reply to warrenellis
  11. @AP_Fuchs "Or, more precisely, like they *expected* a POD book to look like." It's all perception, much outdated and some just wrong. 6:19 PM Nov 23rd from Seesmic in reply to AP_Fuchs
  12. @AP_Fuchs But, yes, I address the design part. And that's something that's up to the publisher (in this case, the individual). 6:16 PM Nov 23rd from Seesmic in reply to AP_Fuchs
  13. @AP_Fuchs That's not entirely true -- a lot of the early POD shops cut some serious corners. Shitty offset is shitty too, of course. 6:14 PM Nov 23rd from Seesmic in reply to AP_Fuchs
  14. @dcurtisj sometimes you say things that I don't understand but make me want to shove you in a locker on principle. BUT I DON'T KNOW WHY. 6:09 PM Nov 23rd from Seesmic in reply to dcurtisj
  15. More *intent* than *process* -- but I'm talking a little about the design of SHIVERING SANDS here: http://is.gd/523lH 12:10 PM Nov 23rd from Seesmic
  16. And in one BRILLIANT stroke, Wil totally ups the POD game: RT @wilw: Hey look! It's the Memories of the Futuremug! http://bit.ly/8YjHGL 10:24 AM Nov 23rd from Seesmic
  17. @slinka Very like! And I find myself humming that old Pet Shop Boys tune a lot. You know -- "You've got the brains, I've got the wrench..." 9:11 AM Nov 23rd from web in reply to slinka
  18. An in-depth* look at the creative process behind TOTW: http://www.arianaosborne.co... *No, not really. 8:46 AM Nov 23rd from web
  19. @riknik Hey, if you've got an idea: build it! You'll note I said "it's possible" not "it'll never work, ever" 12:19 PM Nov 21st from Seesmic in reply to riknik
  20. @riknik Very likely not. It's possible, but think of this: how is a txt message different from a conference call? 10:53 AM Nov 21st from Seesmic in reply to riknik