PatriotsDaily
-
@ @ Almost worth a trip to NO, renting a black Escalade and circling his block. "This looks like somebody important, Rich."
1:24 PM May 17th
via web
in reply to ptwiraga
-
Sunday Notes: Both @ and @ think Matt Light should be in Hall of Fame conversation
6:20 AM May 13th
via TweetDeck
-
@ Won't matter. There will always be doubters, plus those wondering how the next one was REALLY won.
11:24 AM May 1st
via web
in reply to espn_afceast
-
@ Peter, I think some of your Lawn and Garden Tractor magazine columns on Favre inadvertently got printed by SI
9:34 AM May 1st
via web
in reply to SI_PeterKing
-
@ The audio sounds more reasonable than how it looks in print. His overarching point is "Why risk it?"
8:31 AM May 1st
via web
in reply to GregABedard
-
I'm the wrong person to ask ... RT @: @ Yes, but can we realistically ever expect a Buckeye to grow up?
8:13 AM Apr 28th
via Echofon
-
@ Yes, but can we realistically ever expect a Buckeye to grow up?
6:33 AM Apr 28th
via web
in reply to AlbertBreer
-
@ Pats pick player on nobody's radar, make a trade way below value chart; it's Bill Belichick's touching tribute to Al Davis.
6:30 PM Apr 27th
via web
in reply to GregABedard
-
@ @ Is this like last year when you had Favre confirm the big scoop that HOU expressed zero interest in him?
2:01 PM Apr 10th
via web
in reply to SI_PeterKing
-
@ "No Satanic rituals whatsoever!"
9:03 AM Apr 10th
via web
in reply to capeleaguer
-
@ If you look up "ubiquitous" in the dictionary, it's got 5 Bobby Valentine pictures next to it.
11:02 AM Apr 5th
via web
in reply to GlobeChadFinn
-
@ constantly changing strategy is interesting (like game ending on safety, or 4th down sack at midfield) but could be confusing.
9:14 AM Mar 28th
via web
in reply to cgasper
-
@ Conceivably, a team could block a kick, blow their chance at recovering it, and lose their allotted possession in the process.
9:01 AM Mar 28th
via web
-
@ I am intrigued at the potential scenarios. Like opening with an onside kick and then kicking a field goal.
8:57 AM Mar 28th
via web
in reply to cgasper
-
@ injury issue is a fair point. How 'bout this: set the extra period time based on average OT length over last five years?
8:55 AM Mar 28th
via web
in reply to cgasper
-
Too long for networks, too RT @ Too long for NFLPA
8:54 AM Mar 28th
via web
in reply to cgasper
-
@ OT rule was prompted by Favre/Manning not getting OT snap in plyfs. But new rule opens doors for some weird possibilities.
8:32 AM Mar 28th
via web
-
@ The main benefit is that strategy doesn't change from regular game strategy.
8:29 AM Mar 28th
via web
in reply to cgasper
-
@ Belichick's proposal: a set time period, a 5th quarter, but maybe 7 minutes. If still tied after, sudden death.
8:28 AM Mar 28th
via web
in reply to cgasper
-
@ @ You're right. Now we'll finally have a good sample size to reveal the inherent flaws of the new rule.
7:40 AM Mar 28th
via web
in reply to cgasper
|
|