KarlVanHoet
-
@ So. Planes have food. Perhaps you can manufacture a "funny" quip in that regard. (This is humor because I am being facetious)
12:14 PM Sep 25th
from Brizzly
-
@ So. Mm. Clearly you're UN-aware the MONO mixes are QUITE different. Esp with regard to Sgt. Pepper. Shall I say that TWICE? So.
8:21 AM Sep 11th
from Brizzly
-
So. iTunes OGG support? Mm. No? Thought not. Mm. So. NEXT.
12:47 PM Sep 9th
from Brizzly
-
@ So: yes. Ligatures are supported in this distro. More commits to the trunk soon. So.
9:58 PM Mar 11th
from web
in reply to samhey
-
So: `ubob intvan'.
NOTE: This notoriously trivial form of `encryption' is considered harmful for cyphers. Employ solely for humour.
So.
7:36 AM Dec 17th, 2008
from web
-
Re `memes' WRT v*g*n*s. Apparently, civil redactions may render my remarks less humourous. As well as unintentionally implying an*s*s. So.
7:30 AM Dec 17th, 2008
from web
-
So. Apparently, Mr. Bush is a `shoo-in' for some sport people enjoy.
This is humorous because a shoe was recently thrown at the President.
6:00 AM Dec 17th, 2008
from web
-
So. `Lazy Twitter'. Are persons here aware of a discreet vendor of X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-L garments? If so, what is their Privacy Policy?
5:40 AM Dec 17th, 2008
from web
-
@ So. If you enjoy grammar humour, read the notional `Grammar Humour Weakly.'
Which is humorous because it contains a `pun'.
5:26 AM Dec 17th, 2008
from web
in reply to secretsquirrel
-
Interesting. Apparently `@' does not support Emacs profiles. Perhaps you can use `Rails' to build a time machine to 1976.
/sarcasm
5:06 AM Dec 17th, 2008
from web
-
@ So. Will this `humour' be seeded in the superior lossless FLAC format, or are you choosing to micturate onto these zombie `fanatics'?
4:59 AM Dec 17th, 2008
from web
in reply to ylnt
-
@ Interesting. So. Perhaps you should learn more about `ed'. Which I'm sure you do not know is a superior text editing application.
4:58 AM Dec 17th, 2008
from web
in reply to MISSY_BOO
-
@ Sigh. So. You do know that the broken Adobe `CS' line of software is currently at version 4? Perhaps you should read more.
4:55 AM Dec 17th, 2008
from web
in reply to hotdogsladies
-
@ Interesting. So. You do know "YouTube" employs codecs that were compiled on crippled, proprietary software? Significant data point.
4:53 AM Dec 17th, 2008
from web
in reply to jowyang
-
So. Hm. Interesting. Apparently, "Twitter" does not understand diphthongs. Noted. With chagrin.
4:46 AM Dec 17th, 2008
from web
|
|