Profile_bird

Hey there! jeffjarvis is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving jeffjarvis's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

jeffjarvis

  1. @johngapper The only thing wrong with charging is if it cuts you off from the maximum revenue possible. Look at the whole P&L, again. about 6 hours ago from Tweetie in reply to johngapper
  2. @johngapper Nothing will save cost structure as they stand in news. The future is in ecosystems of many players over a few corporations. about 6 hours ago from Tweetie in reply to johngapper
  3. @johngapper But the really ignored factor is cost. There are tremendous savings made possible by the web. Look at the whole P&L. about 6 hours ago from Tweetie in reply to johngapper
  4. @johngapper No, I see advertising as the ultimate practicality. I think it will earn more than charging in a P&L. about 6 hours ago from Tweetie in reply to johngapper
  5. Having board meetings with my students on their entrepreneurial journalism projects. 2 weeks to go until a jury decides who gets real $$ about 13 hours ago from Tweetie
  6. @alansmurray @johngapper I am simply inviting you to a tour of our new business models for local news. about 15 hours ago from Tweetie in reply to alansmurray
  7. @poniewozik The debate is too much about emotions and entitlement, not economics (the alliteration is merely convenient). 5:50 PM Nov 24th from Tweetie in reply to poniewozik
  8. Rushkoff as reactionary. He sounds just like Rupert: entitlement, emotions, bad guys & boogeymen. http://bit.ly/6qQFyp 5:15 PM Nov 24th from Tweetie
  9. @johngapper @alansmurray Come to CUNY and I'll show you mine. 11:54 AM Nov 24th from Tweetie in reply to johngapper
  10. About to go on @brianlehrer's show re Murdoch madness (following a Wikipedia discussion now). 8:46 AM Nov 24th from Tweetie
  11. @sivavaid Google search is a poor fit for news content as well. That's Google's challenge to tackle the current & live web. 7:52 AM Nov 24th from Tweetie in reply to sivavaid
  12. RT @Chanders: Agree @sivavaid, but this wd represent a qualitative if not qualitative shift, right? At least shift back to fractured search? 7:48 AM Nov 24th from Tweetie
  13. True but too bad to see more RT @sivavaid Web has always been fractured by gates, exclusivity deals, languages, search personalization, etc. 7:37 AM Nov 24th from Tweetie
  14. Yes! RT @MinimumFailure: @jeffjarvis do you think Microsoft and News Corp. mating will create singularity and preempt the 2012 apocalypse? 7:33 AM Nov 24th from Tweetie
  15. Yes. Rattled sabres RT @sivavaid: Murdoch likely playing for leverage in potential deal with Google later. He can't be serious about BING. 7:33 AM Nov 24th from Tweetie
  16. Going to be on @brianlehrer's show at 1140a to talk Murdoch madness. http://bit.ly/8hoV5w 7:25 AM Nov 24th from Tweetie
  17. @jayrosen_nyu It's Microsoft that's doing evil here. That they picked News Corp to do evil with.... 7:18 AM Nov 24th from Tweetie in reply to jayrosen_nyu
  18. @jayrosen_nyu My concern is the creation of separate camps of information on the web. 7:18 AM Nov 24th from Tweetie in reply to jayrosen_nyu
  19. @tomwatson Oh, come on, Tom. It's mission, to organize and make accessible the world's information, is a principle. Its business is adverts. 7:17 AM Nov 24th from Tweetie in reply to tomwatson
  20. @jayrosen_nyu Do I care if Rupert or any one company strangles? No. What concerns me is precedents. 6:50 AM Nov 24th from Tweetie in reply to jayrosen_nyu