jeffjarvis
-
@ The only thing wrong with charging is if it cuts you off from the maximum revenue possible. Look at the whole P&L, again.
about 6 hours ago
from Tweetie
in reply to johngapper
-
@ Nothing will save cost structure as they stand in news. The future is in ecosystems of many players over a few corporations.
about 6 hours ago
from Tweetie
in reply to johngapper
-
@ But the really ignored factor is cost. There are tremendous savings made possible by the web. Look at the whole P&L.
about 6 hours ago
from Tweetie
in reply to johngapper
-
@ No, I see advertising as the ultimate practicality. I think it will earn more than charging in a P&L.
about 6 hours ago
from Tweetie
in reply to johngapper
-
Having board meetings with my students on their entrepreneurial journalism projects. 2 weeks to go until a jury decides who gets real $$
about 13 hours ago
from Tweetie
-
@ @ I am simply inviting you to a tour of our new business models for local news.
about 15 hours ago
from Tweetie
in reply to alansmurray
-
@ The debate is too much about emotions and entitlement, not economics (the alliteration is merely convenient).
5:50 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to poniewozik
-
Rushkoff as reactionary. He sounds just like Rupert: entitlement, emotions, bad guys & boogeymen.
5:15 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
-
@ @ Come to CUNY and I'll show you mine.
11:54 AM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to johngapper
-
About to go on @'s show re Murdoch madness (following a Wikipedia discussion now).
8:46 AM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
-
@ Google search is a poor fit for news content as well. That's Google's challenge to tackle the current & live web.
7:52 AM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to sivavaid
-
RT @: Agree @, but this wd represent a qualitative if not qualitative shift, right? At least shift back to fractured search?
7:48 AM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
-
True but too bad to see more RT @ Web has always been fractured by gates, exclusivity deals, languages, search personalization, etc.
7:37 AM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
-
Yes! RT @: @ do you think Microsoft and News Corp. mating will create singularity and preempt the 2012 apocalypse?
7:33 AM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
-
Yes. Rattled sabres RT @: Murdoch likely playing for leverage in potential deal with Google later. He can't be serious about BING.
7:33 AM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
-
Going to be on @'s show at 1140a to talk Murdoch madness.
7:25 AM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
-
@ It's Microsoft that's doing evil here. That they picked News Corp to do evil with....
7:18 AM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to jayrosen_nyu
-
@ My concern is the creation of separate camps of information on the web.
7:18 AM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to jayrosen_nyu
-
@ Oh, come on, Tom. It's mission, to organize and make accessible the world's information, is a principle. Its business is adverts.
7:17 AM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to tomwatson
-
@ Do I care if Rupert or any one company strangles? No. What concerns me is precedents.
6:50 AM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to jayrosen_nyu
|
|