Huperniketes
-
Tremendous respect for @ for his classy, ballsy stand:
1:29 AM Sep 28th
from TweetDeck
-
@ I guess that means hardware engineers are unprofessional.
4:33 PM Aug 24th
from TweetDeck
in reply to patrickwelsh
-
@ Congratulations on the great news! I wish you much success in your sw endeavors in prep for the big day.
10:51 AM Aug 17th
from TweetDeck
in reply to epicycle
-
@ Bienvenido! What are you doing back...so soon?
8:23 PM Aug 16th
from TweetDeck
in reply to DianiRo
-
@ @ The Nagevs.
7:50 PM Aug 16th
from TweetDeck
in reply to CocoaSamurai
-
@ It'd be nice to put DirecTV's dvr head-to-head with MOT's. It's the suck, a lot more problematic than Dish's 522 firmware.
7:38 PM Aug 16th
from TweetDeck
in reply to eschaton
-
@ But at least Landon Fuller has back-ported, and patched, SL's compiler to Leopard and Leppy's ObjC run-time to provide block support.
6:25 PM Aug 16th
from TweetDeck
in reply to jfroy
-
@ Wouldn't "^{ }" generate a syntax error in C/C++?
6:14 PM Aug 16th
from TweetDeck
in reply to jfroy
-
@ Great point! I'd prefer extending C's array initializer syntax to NSArray (and NSDictionary) literals with "@{ }", but yes, that too
6:13 PM Aug 16th
from TweetDeck
in reply to mjtsai
-
@ No, but there's precedent for Smalltalk-like syntax, such as methods and blocks. And using '@' for the delimiter retains consistency.
6:02 PM Aug 16th
from TweetDeck
in reply to jfroy
-
@ I'm sure they can be invoked from C/C++ just as ObjC methods can be, but defining blocks with "^{ }" looks crass and inconsistent.
4:43 PM Aug 16th
from TweetDeck
in reply to jfroy
-
Is there any practical reason "@[ ]" couldn't have been used for Objective-C's block syntax?
4:16 PM Aug 16th
from TweetDeck
-
@ @ Are you familiar w/ Garvin's 5 definitions () and 8 dimensions of Q ()?
1:14 PM Aug 16th
from TweetDeck
in reply to QualityFrog
-
Apparently I enjoy giving obscure references more than folks like reading them
. Sorry bout that!
10:00 PM Aug 13th
from TweetDeck
-
@ Since WWDC08 at least. The irony is the build number's similarity to the cpu arch intended to replace the CISC-based x86.
9:39 PM Aug 13th
from TweetDeck
in reply to chrisfarber
-
It'd be quite ironic if 10A432 actually is the GM for Snow Leopard and is only available for Intel's x86 cpu.
9:11 PM Aug 13th
from TweetDeck
-
@ What if you had a test for determinism? or that order was insignificant?
11:25 PM Aug 12th
from web
in reply to unclebobmartin
-
@ I grew up in MIA, and can see how "funny" accent == Cuban refugee: I *always* have to use close-captioning when watching Dr. Who.
4:21 PM Aug 12th
from TweetDeck
in reply to mfeathers
-
@ The headline got my attention, but didn't motivate me to read the post. Different goals, different results.
10:14 AM Aug 12th
from TweetDeck
in reply to briansolis
-
@ Do scm gui's construct directives that are faulty when large teams or complex projects are involved?
9:05 AM Aug 12th
from TweetDeck
in reply to schwa
|
- Name Alfonso Guerra
- Location Crawfordville, FL
- Web http://apokalypse...
- Bio Seer. Founder/Pres, Apokalypse Software Corp. (@apokalypse on Twitter), Software Process Reengineering.
|
