FyodorFish
-
@ Hmm, yeah, I noticed t/absence of a time stamp. Seriously, though, if it wasn't for t/livetweet, I'd watch LIFEFORCE tonight.
half a minute ago
from web
in reply to kevincarr
-
RT @: Here's your chance to win a copy of ‘Terminator Salvation’ Blu-ray from Geeks of Doom:
10 minutes ago
from web
-
@ Ha, awesome. Did you check t/disc for scratches? Don't want it to fail 1/2 through t/live-tweet.
13 minutes ago
from web
in reply to kevincarr
-
he'll be known as that dude who wrote that book Spielberg turned into a perfect summer blockbuster. Nothing wrong w/that, of course.
14 minutes ago
from web
-
@ but ultimately shallow (derivative story, uni-dimensional characters, long-winded exposition). 20-30 yrs from now (cont)
15 minutes ago
from web
-
@ example when it comes to RW ideology. As for Crichton, I enjoyed his work, perfect airport/airplane reading. Engaging (cont)
16 minutes ago
from web
-
@ Ah, so you're a climate change denier too? Can't say I'm surprised, just disappointed. Sad to see a textbook (cont)
17 minutes ago
from web
in reply to screenrant
-
James Cameron Joneses for Effects:
about 5 hours ago
from web
-
@ You've gone from beating a dead horse to field-dressing said horse. Yeah, time to move on to other jokes.
about 7 hours ago
from web
-
@ @ This DailyKos (ha!) diary sums up my thoughts on escalation + BO:
about 7 hours ago
from web
-
@ Any fact-based arguments, not ones based on fears (or fear-mongering) or hypotheticals loosely connected to facts.
about 8 hours ago
from web
in reply to JimAlger
-
@ a centralized govt (a corrupt one at that) will safeguard Pakistan's nukes. I don't see it, but I'm willing to hear (cont)
about 8 hours ago
from web
in reply to JimAlger
-
@ I'd like to hear/read more how sending more troops to occupy a mountainous, ethnically diverse country w/o (cont)
about 8 hours ago
from web
in reply to JimAlger
-
@ My position and concerns are based on reading history, culture, religion, and geography of t/area.
about 8 hours ago
from web
in reply to JimAlger
-
@ But since you have no more access to intel than I do, you're argument is based purely on trust and deference to authority.
about 8 hours ago
from web
in reply to JimAlger
-
@ I assume you meant "uninformed," not "uneducated" then you used t/he knows more (intel) argument. That's t/authority fallacy.
about 8 hours ago
from web
in reply to JimAlger
-
@ Specifically, you made generalized accusations w/o a shred of back-up, tarring everyone who disagreed as "uneducated opposition."
about 8 hours ago
from web
in reply to JimAlger
-
@ You made fallacious arguments: generalization, authority. Here's a list for you to review: It should help.
about 8 hours ago
from web
in reply to JimAlger
-
@ Didn't have a chance to get back to you yesterday. Nothing you said sounded even remotely convincing (cont).
about 8 hours ago
from web
in reply to JimAlger
-
RT @: The SF Chronicle reports on the comics included in our upcoming newspaper issue, the San Francisco Panorama: http:/
...
about 8 hours ago
from web
|
- Name Mel Valentin
- Location San Francisco
- Web http://www.rotten...
- Bio Senior Editor and Writer for eFilmCritic.com and SFStation.com.
|
