EcoInteractive
- @ I see now, my DMs disappeared into cyber space because you are not following me.about 2 hours ago from Splitweet in reply to CrushTheCFR
- Good morning everyone, I hope you all weren't annoyed by my debate with Carl.about 4 hours ago from Splitweet
- @ I got to take this to Direct Message, I have 83,000 followers to think about. ;)about 5 hours ago from Splitweet
- @ We do not have a political agenda. We do our best to focus on science, not opinions. There is room for doubt w/ every sci theory.about 13 hours ago from Splitweet in reply to nelderini
- @ I am interested to know if there have been other periods of Rapid Climate Change and man's adaptation. How do you define rapid?about 13 hours ago from Splitweet in reply to CrushTheCFR
- @ It's a fact that man is changing the chemistry of both Air and Oceans, lets agree that is not a wise thing to do.about 13 hours ago from Splitweet in reply to CrushTheCFR
- @ I am totally w/ you. Climate Policy should be based on best science. Minds should remain open!about 13 hours ago from Splitweet in reply to nelderini
- @ I respect your PhD, but don't get your point. I don't know how else to say it, I focus on the body of science, not opinions.about 13 hours ago from Splitweet in reply to CrushTheCFR
- @ We welcome all credible scientific work on the subject. IPCC models are a small piece of the picture however, they may be flawed.about 14 hours ago from Splitweet
- @ What about ocean acidification? You denying that too? Oceans are 30% more acidic in last 100 years due to CO2 levels in air.about 14 hours ago from Splitweet in reply to CrushTheCFR
- Basing Climate Change public policy on contrarian science is like canceling your car insurance becuase there's no proof of future accidents.about 14 hours ago from Splitweet
- @ It is possible that the contrarians are correct. But it would be foolish to base public policy on contrarian science.about 14 hours ago from Splitweet
- Talks Rachel Pike: The science behind a climate headline Video on TED.com about 14 hours ago from Facebook
- @ Look at Climate Change from a Risk Management standpoint & ask yourself: "What is I am wrong?" What's prudent when uncertain?about 18 hours ago from Splitweet
- @ I did look at your bio, you are Anthropologist, not a climate scientist. You are offering opinions, not research studies.about 19 hours ago from Splitweet
- @ I don't know how much more clear I can be, I am interested in Opinion, Public or Scientific, when it comes to setting policy.about 19 hours ago from Splitweet
- @ There is no point debating opinions. Everyone has there own, mine's not particularly important.I focus on the body of science.about 19 hours ago from Splitweet
- @ yes, fringe science, meaning minority contrarian sci studies, I'm cognizant that not ALL the sci points in one direction.about 19 hours ago from Splitweet
- @ Not true, in fact the Oil/Coal industry are the ones buying sci propaganda. All the financial incentives are to work for them.about 19 hours ago from Splitweet in reply to CrushTheCFR
- @ Believing or Not Believing in C Change focuses on opinion.The weight of the Sci Research is not opinion & mostly points one wayabout 19 hours ago from Splitweet in reply to CrushTheCFR
|
- Name EcoInteractive
- Location Costa Rica
- Web http://unhub.com/...
- Bio Eco Preservation Society: Inspiring Action, Empowering People,Connecting Communities & Transforming the Planet through Conservation, Reforestation & Education
|
