Cruella1
-
@ ...amazing how far a ten minute chat about make-up can go towards changing attitude! So thank you.
18 minutes ago
via Mobile Web
in reply to ParisLees
-
@ for you? Of course hon! You had a big impact on the WAST women...
19 minutes ago
via Mobile Web
in reply to ParisLees
-
Ace people from Intersect @, @, @, @, @, @, @
about 3 hours ago
via web
-
@ Watching Sarah Millican on Would I Lie to You and all I can think of is your Four Thought broadcast :P
about 2 hours ago
via HTC Peep
-
By the way - show at @ is cancelled tonight so I shall instead be at @ at the Watershed in South Wimbledon. Come!
about 5 hours ago
via web
-
@ didn't say that. i said historically in more religious times, these things were more prevalent and (more) legal.
about 6 hours ago
via web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
-
@ when you specify those areas I might. But you haven't. Your definition of "moral social decline" was gibberish.
about 6 hours ago
via Mobile Web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
-
@ well there was even more religion back then, so I assumed your argument would hold. Ooops, it doesn't!
about 6 hours ago
via Mobile Web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
-
@ and you're ignoring huge improvements in rights for women, LGBT people, disabled people, ethnic minorities, children...
about 6 hours ago
via Mobile Web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
-
@ but you haven't given me one clear example of this "moral decline".
about 7 hours ago
via Mobile Web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
-
@ yes I think providing support for those in need is an act of "morality" if you like, certainly "humanity".
about 7 hours ago
via Mobile Web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
-
@ I don't see much evidence for that. But if a handful do, is that worse than having hundreds of thousands dying in poverty?
about 7 hours ago
via Mobile Web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
-
@ there have always been teen pregnancies. it's just that we used to lock them up or force them into unsuitable marriages.
about 7 hours ago
via web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
-
@ you just don't have a point here. "decline in moral standards" is a piece of tabloid bullshit-speak.
about 7 hours ago
via web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
-
@ you think social pressure to conform to "fashion" standards is new? people today have much more freedom over how they dress.
about 7 hours ago
via web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
-
@ has it occurred to you that sending small children up chimneys to clean them and locking up the poor was in any way "immoral"?
about 8 hours ago
via web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
-
@ so it's immoral to produce counterfeit goods, because you'd be denying revenue to CHANEL or LOUIS VUITTON? really? immoral?
about 8 hours ago
via web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
-
@ the idea that people actively choose to be on benefits is just a load of tabloid crap. you know that right?
about 8 hours ago
via web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
-
@ lots of people were unable to work in the past and we left them on the streets to die. how was this moral?
about 8 hours ago
via web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
-
@ "general decline in morals"? i don't really see any clear examples.
about 8 hours ago
via web
in reply to HodgesLloyd
|
- Name Kate Smurthwaite
- Location London
- Web http://www.cruell...
- Bio Well these days I seem to be mostly known as that atheist b*tchslap woman, but I am also a stand-up comic around the UK and sometimes overseas. Come see me.
|
