Profile_bird

Hey there! Big_Norm is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving Big_Norm's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

Big_Norm

  1. @WildlifeStuff Underground tank with electric pump and non-return valve feeds the house taps and the water heater. Not complicated :-))
  2. @WildlifeStuff We have 2 Brita filter jugs for drinking water, fill one then fill the next from the 1st. Water perfectly clear. Kettle clean
  3. @CarolineFW Anna Curtis ??
  4. @DiggerEdd At ur age I was so cool I was freezing!
  5. Singapore crude ( #Tapis $US 79.33) currently (Monday, 23 November, 2009, 10:40 GMT) $Au 85.8112
  6. @DiggerEdd What's going to go wrong next? - Ulcers! Let it go, be cool man :-)
  7. Any member who passes ETS legislation under the current circumstances, will be seen as negligent http://joannenova.com.au/
  8. @CarolineFW U R a sentimentalist!
  9. @wiggled Endocrine Disrupters! I'm only upto 31 gimme a break!
  10. @WildlifeStuff this day and age would be simple and at a modest cost! IMHO :-)
  11. @WildlifeStuff some rainwater for bathing in after it was boiled. I ain;t saying to go back that far but collecting it and filtering it in
  12. @WildlifeStuff would take a couple of pails to the pump down the lane to collect drinking water. A barrel at the side of the house collected
  13. @WildlifeStuff .. version couldn't be used in the UK, more consistant rain than us. In the 50s my gran didn't have a tap in the house and we
  14. @WildlifeStuff We harvest/store every drop of rain that falls on our roof in an underground water tank. Don't understand why a smaller...
  15. Wondering if there us any link between the #climategate mob and the Cambridge Apostles http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
  16. @wiggled Did you eventually get more feedback for the autopsy (2006) cos I thought it was absolutely brilliant. Thanks for that. Special :-)
  17. @DiggerEdd LOL
  18. whether it is true or not is not what the publisherscare about - it is how the journal is seen by thecommunity that counts http://twe.ly/pOb
  19. @DiggerEdd Now I understand the m mm controversy :-)
  20. The emails suggest the authors co-operated covertly to ensure that only papers favorable to CO2-forced AGW were published http://twe.ly/oOb